Article Navigation
Article Contents
-
Abstract
-
INTRODUCTION
-
METHODS
-
RESULTS
-
DISCUSSION
-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
-
REFERENCES
- < Previous
- Next >
Journal Article
, Erin Wamsley, PhD 1Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 2Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 3Department of Psychology, Furman University, Greenville, SC Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Claire E.H.M. Donjacour, MD 4Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Thomas E. Scammell, MD 5Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 6Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Gert Jan Lammers, MD, PhD 4Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands 7Sleep Wake Center SEIN, Heemstede, The Netherlands Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Robert Stickgold, PhD 1Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 2Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT This was not an industry supported study. This research was supported by grants R01-MH48832 and T32-HL07901 from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Donjacour has received speaker honoraria from UCB pharmaceuticals and has been an investigator on research funded by a grant from UCB pharmaceuticals. Dr. Scammell has consulted for Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Concert Pharmaceuticals, and has received lecture honoraria from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. The other authors have indicated no financial conflicts of interest. There was no off-label usage. *Address correspondence to: Robert Stickgold, PhD, Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue E/FD 861, Boston MA 02215; Tel: (617) 667-8485; E-mail: rstickgold@hms.harvard.edu Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic
Sleep, Volume 37, Issue 2, 1 February 2014, Pages 419–422, https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.3428
Published:
01 February 2014
Article history
Received:
01 March 2013
Revision received:
01 May 2013
Accepted:
01 June 2013
Published:
01 February 2014
- Split View
- Views
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Video
- Audio
- Supplementary Data
-
Cite
Cite
Erin Wamsley, Claire E.H.M. Donjacour, Thomas E. Scammell, Gert Jan Lammers, Robert Stickgold, Delusional Confusion of Dreaming and Reality in Narcolepsy, Sleep, Volume 37, Issue 2, 1 February 2014, Pages 419–422, https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.3428
Close
Search
Close
Search
Advanced Search
Search Menu
Abstract
Study Objectives:
We investigated a generally unappreciated feature of the sleep disorder narcolepsy, in which patients mistake the memory of a dream for a real experience and form sustained delusions about significant events.
Design:
We interviewed patients with narcolepsy and healthy controls to establish the prevalence of this complaint and identify its predictors.
Setting:
Academic medical centers in Boston, Massachusetts and Leiden, The Netherlands.
Participants:
Patients (n = 46) with a diagnosis of narcolepsy with cataplexy, and age-matched healthy healthy controls (n = 41).
Interventions:
N/A.
Measurements and Results:
“Dream delusions” were surprisingly common in narcolepsy and were often striking in their severity. As opposed to fleeting hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations of the sleep/wake transition, dream delusions were false memories induced by the experience of a vivid dream, which led to false beliefs that could persist for days or weeks.
Conclusions:
The delusional confusion of dreamed events with reality is a prominent feature of narcolepsy, and suggests the possibility of source memory deficits in this disorder that have not yet been fully characterized.
Dreaming, memory, narcolepsy
INTRODUCTION
Each time we recall an event from the past, we are faced with the dual tasks of identifying the source of the memory and evaluating its veracity. In general, we can accurately determine whether a memory originated in our past experience, as opposed to in our imagination, a dream, a film, or a story. However, this process of source monitoring sometimes goes wrong.1–3 Minor confusions about the source of a memory are common in the general population, as when we mistake the source of a quotation, misremember the context in which we met an acquaintance, or even believe that we actually experienced an event that we only heard about. Recently, case reports have described more severe examples of memory source confusion in patients suffering from the sleep disorder narcolepsy, in which false accusations of sexual assault occurred when patients mistook a dreamed assault for the memory of an actual event.4,5 These reports are remarkable in that dream memories were misinterpreted as representing real, highly significant life events, leading to sustained delusions that became the basis for serious actions. Narcolepsy is a disorder of excessive sleepiness, and is not typically associated with psychotic symptoms.6 The dramatic nature of these case reports led us to undertake the first systematic study of these dream delusions in narcolepsy. In a structured telephone interview, we asked patients with narcolepsy and healthy controls a series of questions about sleep, dreaming, and memory. Our goals were to characterize the incidence of this phenomenon in patients with narcolepsy, as compared to the general population, and to describe the features of this experience.
METHODS
Participants
Patients with narcolepsy and age-matched healthy controls were recruited at two collaborating sites: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts (n = 18), and Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands (n = 69). Institutional review boards at both institutions approved this research. Patients (n = 46; age 34.2 ± 10.9 y [SD], 59% female) had a definite diagnosis of narcolepsy with cataplexy for a minimum of 6 mo prior to the study, according to the standards of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2) Diagnostic and Coding Manual.7 Diagnoses were confirmed by interview and review of medical records, including clinic notes, overnight sleep studies, multiple sleep latency tests (MSLTs), and HLA testing. At the time of the interviews, patients were under treatment with a variety of medications to manage their narcolepsy, including stimulants (72% of patients; includes modafinil, amphetamine, dextro-amphetamine, and methylphenidate), antidepressants (15% of patients; includes tricyclic agents, selective serotonin reup-take inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin agonist and reuptake inhibitors), and sodium oxybate (35% of patients). There were no differences in medication usage between those with and without dream delusions (chi-square tests of independence: stimulants: P = 0.82, anti-depressants: P = 0.64, sodium oxybate: P = 0.69). Healthy controls were recruited from the general population (n = 41; age 32.7 ± 11.6 y SD, 59% female), and were screened (by self-report) to exclude the presence of any diagnosed sleep disorder. There were no differences across study sites in participant age, sex, habitual sleep schedule, dream recall, or incidence of reported confusion (see supplemental Table S1 for participant demographics).
Interview Procedures
Participants completed a ∼30-min structured telephone interview in which they were asked a series of questions pertaining to sleep, dreaming, and memory. The full text of the interview script is provided in the Supplemental Methods section. Following questions about their habitual sleep schedule and dream experiences, participants were asked, “Have you ever had the experience of being unsure whether something was real, or if it was from a dream?” Delusional episodes were defined as incidents in which a fully awake participant was uncertain if a memory was dreamed or real, or was convinced that a memory was real, only later to discover that it was actually dreamed. To be included, a delusional episode was required to clearly persist into the waking state. Fleeting feelings of confusion during the transition to wakefulness were excluded because brief confusion is a well-known consequence of the hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations characterizing narcolepsy. For purposes of analysis, participants were categorized as a “Yes” for having dream delusions if they claimed to have experiences that met this definition, and were able to provide at least one detailed example of an instance when this had occurred.
To compare general features of dreaming between patients with narcolepsy and healthy controls, participants also rated the frequency, emotionality, and intensity of their typical dream experiences on a five-point scale.
At the conclusion of the interview, two standardized questionnaires were verbally administered—the Boundary Questionnaire and the Prospective-Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ). Ernest Hartmann's Boundary Questionnaire8,9 assesses the personality construct of psychological boundaries. A “thin” boundary score (higher values) is associated with frequent and intense dreaming, as well as high interest in dreams, and the report of unusual sleep experiences such as sleep paralysis and sleep related hallucinations, both of which are features of narcolepsy. We administered the 18-item short form of the Boundary Questionaire.8 The PRMQ10,11 assesses subjective complaints of difficulties in remembering to carry out intentions (prospective memory), and in remembering the events of the recent past (retrospective memory). Seventeen participants who reported dream/reality confusions meeting our criteria additionally reported to the laboratory for a face-to-face interview in which they described the qualities of these experiences in greater detail.
RESULTS
Dream delusions were extremely common in narcolepsy. Overall, 83% of patients with narcolepsy reported that they had confused dreams with reality, compared to only 15% of healthy controls (χ2 = 40.1, P < 10-10; Figure 1). The severity of these delusions was striking. One man, after dreaming that a young girl had drowned in a nearby lake, asked his wife to turn on the local news in full expectation that the event would be covered. Another patient experienced sexual dreams of being unfaithful to her husband. She believed this had actually happened and felt guilty about it until she chanced to meet the ‘lover’ from her dreams and realized they had not seen each other in years, and had not been romantically involved. Several patients dreamed that their parents, children, or pets had died, believing that this was true (one patient even made a phone call about funeral arrangements) until shocked with evidence to the contrary, when the presumed deceased suddenly reappeared. Although not all examples were this dramatic, such extreme scenarios were not uncommon.
Figure 1
Prevalence of dream-reality confusion. Patients with narcolepsy were much more likely to report mistaking dream experiences as true memories, in comparison with age-matched healthy controls.
Open in new tabDownload slide
All patients with narcolepsy reporting dream delusions provided multiple examples of such occurrences. Two thirds of patients (65%) who completed the follow-up interview reported experiencing dream delusions at least once a week, and all but two (95%) had the experience at least once a month. In contrast, of the six control participants who reported delusions, only two (5% of all control subjects) had experienced this more than once in their lives.
The classic hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations of narcolepsy are fleeting images and feelings linked to the current environment, and patients recognize the hallucinatory nature of the experience within seconds of awakening. In contrast, the experiences reported here were much longer lasting, persisting into stable wakefulness. In follow-up interviews (see Methods), patients reported that although some delusions resolved within minutes after awakening, they often persisted for hours, days, or even weeks.
In line with prior literature,12,13 narcolepsy patients rated their dreams as substantially more vivid (t83 = 3.79; P = 0.0003) and more emotional (t82 = 5.25; P < 10-6) than the age-matched healthy controls. They also reported recalling dreams more frequently than healthy controls (t84 = 3.16; P = 0.002), and scored higher on the BQ than healthy controls (indicating that patients had “thinner” boundaries; t85 = 1.98; P = 0.05). However, we found no evidence that dream delusions were related to an abnormal quantity or quality of dream experience in narcolepsy. Within the narcolepsy sample, neither BQ scores nor any other measure of dreaming differentiated between those who did and did not experience confusions (all P > 0.1).
Although prior research has largely failed to find objective memory dysfunction in narcolepsy,14–16 subjective complaints of memory difficulty are common.17 Here, narcolepsy patients scored higher than healthy controls on the PRMQ for both retrospective memory problems (t85 = 3.71, P = 0.0004) and prospective memory problems (difficulties in remembering to carry out intentions; t85 = 4.20, P = 0.00007; see supplemental Figure S1). However, memory impairment as measured by the PRMQ did not discriminate between narcolepsy patients with and without dream delusions.
DISCUSSION
Our data reveal an underappreciated problem with memory in narcolepsy, in which patients are prone to delusionally believe that dreamed events actually occurred. These “dream delusions” are a special case of memory source confusion, a well-described phenomenon in which the origin of a particular memory is misattributed.2 The conflation of dream experiences with actual events has previously been described in healthy controls.18,19 However, in this sample of patients with narcolepsy, the incidence and severity of dream delusions was striking, and far greater than that seen in healthy controls. These observations suggest that something about the pathophysiology of narcolepsy leads to a profound confusion of memory source. Although the mechanism of dream delusions cannot be determined at this time, several possibilities present themselves.
First, on the phenomenological level, our observations confirm previous reports of frequent and intense dreaming in narcolepsy.12,13 Thus, it is possible that patients mistake dream experiences for real events because the vividness of their dreams prevents the use of perceptual realism as a cue in discriminating the dreamed from reality. Our data did not provide support for this hypothesis, as dream vividness ratings did not discriminate between patients with and without delusions. However, the possibility that these delusions are caused by an abnormal intensity of dream experience in narcolepsy certainly cannot be ruled out.
Alternatively, dream delusions may be just one manifestation of a more general memory deficit in this disorder. Consistent with this possibility, we found evidence of subjective memory difficulties in narcolepsy, as assessed by the PRMQ. Again, however, this measure did not discriminate between patients with and without delusions. To our knowledge, no prior study has examined any form of memory source confusion in narcolepsy. Thus, it cannot be said at this time whether the delusions observed here are specific to dreaming, or whether patients with narcolepsy might be equally prone to confuse the origin of other memories; for example, mistaking imagined events or stories they have heard as personal experiences. Future studies using standard source monitoring tasks in patients with narcolepsy should be able to better determine the specificity of this complaint.
Finally, dream delusions could result from an abnormality of memory encoding specific to the sleep state. The failure to discriminate memories formed during sleep from waking life experiences could be a direct consequence of the well-described neural mechanisms of narcolepsy. Narcolepsy is caused by destruction of orexin/hypocretin neurons in the lateral hypothalamus. Normally, the orexin system helps stabilize wake/sleep states, and loss of the orexin neurons results in “state dissociation” characterized by frequent transitions between states and the intrusion of aspects of rapid eye movement sleep into waking.20 Because monoaminergic and cholinergic neurons involved in the control of sleep states are major targets of the orexin neurons, we speculate that abnormal activity in these neurons during sleep could alter the encoding of dream content in long-term memory stores, leading to its misattribution as waking memory. Disruption of sleep neuro-modulation, for example, could cause features of wakefulness to blend into rapid eye movement sleep, strengthening the typically poor memory encoding during this state.
Although the underlying mechanism of dream delusions is unknown, it is clear that many people with narcolepsy have a surprising and intense difficulty distinguishing the dreamed from reality. In concert, these patients perceive themselves as having more general difficulties with both retrospective and prospective memory. These observations highlight the possibility of source memory deficits in narcolepsy that have not yet been fully characterized.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Drs. Wamsley and Donjacour contributed equally to this work. The authors thank Andrew Olsen for assistance in transcribing interviews and data entry.
REFERENCES
1
Schacter DL Guerin SA St. Jacques PL
Memory distortion: an adaptive perspective
,
Trends Cogn Sci
,
2011
,vol.
15
(pg.
467
-
74
)
2
Johnson MK
Source monitoring and memory distortion
,
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
,
1997
,vol.
352
(pg.
1733
-
45
)
3
Mazzoni GA Loftus EF
When dreams become reality
,
Conscious Cogn
,
1996
,vol.
5
(pg.
442
-
62
)
4
Hays P
False but sincere accusations of sexual assault made by narcoleptic [correction of narcotic] patients
,
Med Leg J
,
1992
,vol.
60
(pg.
265
-
71
)
5
Szűcs A Janszky J Hollo A
Misleading hallucinations in unrecognized narcolepsy
,
Acta Psychiatr Scand
,
2003
,vol.
108
(pg.
314
-
7
)
6
Fortuyn HAD Lappenschaar GA Nienhuis FJ
Psychotic symptoms in narcolepsy: phenomenology and a comparison with schizophrenia
,
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
,
2009
,vol.
31
(pg.
146
-
54
)
7
Nosology Committee of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine
,
The international classification of sleep disorders
,
2006
2nd Edition
Westchester, IL
American Academy of Sleep Medicine
OpenURL Placeholder Text
8
Rawlings D
An exploratory factor analysis of Hartmann's Boundary Questionnaire and an empirically-derived short version
,
Imagination, Cognition and Personality
,
2001
,vol.
21
(pg.
131
-
44
)
9
Hartmann E
Boundaries of dreams, boundaries of dreamers: thin and thick boundaries as a new personality measure
,
Psychiatr J Univ Ott
,
1989
,vol.
14
(pg.
557
-
60
)
10
Crawford JR Smith G Maylor EA
The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample
,
Memory
,
2003
,vol.
11
(pg.
261
-
75
)
11
Smith G Della Sala S Logie RH
Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: a questionnaire study
,
Memory
,
2000
,vol.
8
(pg.
311
-
21
)
12
Fosse R
REM mentation in narcoleptics and normals: an empirical test of two neurocognitive theories
,
Conscious Cogn
,
2000
,vol.
9
(pg.
488
-
509
)
13
Mazzetti M Bellucci C Mattarozzi K
REM-dreams recall in patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy
,
Brain Res Bull
,
2010
,vol.
81
(pg.
133
-
40
)
14
Rogers AE Rosenberg RS
Tests of memory in narcoleptics
,
Sleep
,
1990
,vol.
13
(pg.
42
-
52
)
15
Fulda S Schulz H
Cognitive dysfunction in sleep disorders
,
Sleep Med Rev
,
2001
,vol.
5
(pg.
423
-
45
)
16
Aguirre M Broughton R Stuss D
Does memory impairment exist in narcolepsy-cataplexy?
,
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol
,
1985
,vol.
7
(pg.
14
-
24
)
17
Hood B Bruck D
Metamemory in narcolepsy
,
J Sleep Res
,
1997
,vol.
6
(pg.
205
-
10
)
18
Kemp S Burt CDB Sheen M
Remembering dreamt and actual experiences
,
Appl Cogn Psychol
,
2003
,vol.
17
(pg.
577
-
91
)
19
Rassin E Merckelbach H Spaan V
When dreams become a royal road to confusion: realistic dreams, dissociation, and fantasy proneness
,
J Nerv Ment Dis
,
2001
,vol.
189
(pg.
478
-
81
)
20
Mochizuki T Crocker A McCormack S
Behavioral state instability in orexin knock-out mice
,
J Neurosci
,
2004
,vol.
24
(pg.
6291
-
300
)
© 2014 Associated Professional Sleep Societies, LLC.
Topic:
- delusions
- dreams
- narcolepsy
- memory
Subject
Neurological Disorders
Issue Section:
Short Note
Download all slides
Comments
0 Comments
Comments (0)
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.
Advertisem*nt
Citations
Views
21,886
Altmetric
More metrics information
Metrics
Total Views 21,886
20,767 Pageviews
1,119 PDF Downloads
Since 3/1/2017
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
March 2017 | 3 |
April 2017 | 5 |
May 2017 | 1 |
June 2017 | 6 |
July 2017 | 1 |
August 2017 | 8 |
September 2017 | 2 |
October 2017 | 8 |
November 2017 | 4 |
December 2017 | 37 |
January 2018 | 35 |
February 2018 | 65 |
March 2018 | 91 |
April 2018 | 55 |
May 2018 | 30 |
June 2018 | 25 |
July 2018 | 42 |
August 2018 | 43 |
September 2018 | 211 |
October 2018 | 101 |
November 2018 | 66 |
December 2018 | 47 |
January 2019 | 36 |
February 2019 | 54 |
March 2019 | 45 |
April 2019 | 79 |
May 2019 | 55 |
June 2019 | 53 |
July 2019 | 50 |
August 2019 | 59 |
September 2019 | 106 |
October 2019 | 128 |
November 2019 | 111 |
December 2019 | 111 |
January 2020 | 131 |
February 2020 | 164 |
March 2020 | 191 |
April 2020 | 203 |
May 2020 | 152 |
June 2020 | 269 |
July 2020 | 336 |
August 2020 | 299 |
September 2020 | 369 |
October 2020 | 399 |
November 2020 | 366 |
December 2020 | 485 |
January 2021 | 431 |
February 2021 | 430 |
March 2021 | 648 |
April 2021 | 569 |
May 2021 | 573 |
June 2021 | 526 |
July 2021 | 577 |
August 2021 | 605 |
September 2021 | 648 |
October 2021 | 522 |
November 2021 | 381 |
December 2021 | 351 |
January 2022 | 329 |
February 2022 | 335 |
March 2022 | 457 |
April 2022 | 527 |
May 2022 | 544 |
June 2022 | 542 |
July 2022 | 361 |
August 2022 | 294 |
September 2022 | 362 |
October 2022 | 391 |
November 2022 | 387 |
December 2022 | 301 |
January 2023 | 324 |
February 2023 | 322 |
March 2023 | 413 |
April 2023 | 380 |
May 2023 | 316 |
June 2023 | 232 |
July 2023 | 272 |
August 2023 | 387 |
September 2023 | 329 |
October 2023 | 298 |
November 2023 | 300 |
December 2023 | 265 |
January 2024 | 297 |
February 2024 | 368 |
March 2024 | 317 |
April 2024 | 374 |
May 2024 | 297 |
June 2024 | 167 |
Email alerts
Article activity alert
Advance article alerts
New issue alert
Subject alert
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic
Citing articles via
Google Scholar
-
Latest
-
Most Read
-
Most Cited
More from Oxford Academic
Clinical Medicine
Clinical Neuroscience
Medicine and Health
Neuroscience
Science and Mathematics
Sleep Medicine
Books
Journals
Lincoln, Nebraska
Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
Burlington, Vermont
Long Island, New York
Advertisem*nt